A Brief To Free A Slave
‹‹ First ‹ Prev Comments(12) Random Next › Last ››

A Brief To Free A Slave

Samuel Johnson, in addition to writing THE DICTIONARY, was a hardcore abolitionist.  He detested both the practice of slavery and the owners of said slaves.  He was no doubt pleased, therefore, when – in 1772 – slavery was officially abolished in England.  This, of course, didn’t abolish it elsewhere in the world, and Johnson had some strong words for American and Scotland, among other nations.  The quote in the first panel of the comic is from 1775, just prior to the American Revolution.  The rest was from his short brief on the subject of slavery from 1777, in response to a particular case in Scotland.

Anyway, the point is that – had it been commonplace for people to get served in the 18th Century, then I think you could safely say that America totally got served by Johnson.

This isn’t to say that England was faultless at the time.  They were still careening around the world planting flags everywhere.  But, at least in the area of slavery, they were about a century ahead of the curve compared to America.

On an entirely different note, I just skipped a portion of the Norton covering Frances Burney’s vivid and somewhat captivating journal.  Normally, if I skip one or two works, I don’t bother to mention it, but in this case, I have to force you all to share in my terror.  There is a famous few pages in her journal in which we, the audience, are treated to a terrifying first-person account of having a mastectomy in 1811.  That link quotes what is only the culmination of several pages of suspense and horror, the likes of which many writers only wish they could conjure.  The way she so vividly captures the feeling of having a pre-anesthetic mastectomy is probably going to give me nightmares tonight.

Needless to say, I couldn’t think of a suitable comic for the topic.  I just wanted you to join me in collective horror.

Author: Samuel Johnson Date of Publication: 1777 Source: Wikipedia
Browse the Comic archive. This entry is tagged . Chapter: . Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

12 Comments

  1. dr pepper
    Posted October 11, 2012 at 1:31 AM | Permalink

    As for hypocrisy, it’s kind of institutionalized now. So much of our modern economy in the US and Europe depends on things made by slaves or seatshop workers. In fact, most of us would be naked and gadgetless if we held out for only fair trade goods.

       0 likes

  2. dr pepper
    Posted October 11, 2012 at 1:21 AM | Permalink

    Well i’m certainly not going to read it now. But how often did people live long enough to die of breast cancer back then? Combine that with the risk of death from infection– she must have been in incredible pain even before the operation.

       0 likes

  3. The Vicar
    Posted October 9, 2012 at 3:05 PM | Permalink

    One thing which is rarely mentioned when the abolition of slavery in Britain is brought up is that even the hardcore abolitionists were almost always using imported products produced with slavery, and many of them were turning a tidy profit from enterprises which relied on slavery abroad. (The production of cotton, sugar, and rum, just to name three things which were huge money-spinners in Britain during the era of “advanced” British attitudes, were all reliant on slavery outside of Britain.)

    Of course, the British also approved of piracy, as long as it was their pirates attacking foreign ships, so it’s kind of par for the course.

       0 likes

    • John Troutman
      Posted October 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM | Permalink

      True enough! As I said in the commentary, Britain was hardly perfect, but at least they had given the problem some thought.

         0 likes

      • The Vicar
        Posted October 9, 2012 at 3:25 PM | Permalink

        But the extent of the hypocrisy is amazing to us now. The idea that you would be against something, but at the same time be turning vast profits off of it, is stunning. The British abolitionists weren’t actually against slavery in any practical way, they were just NIMBY hipsters — “we were protesting against things only when they happened nearby BEFORE it was cool”.

        It would be like if the Republicans, who have traditionally had the support of U.S. blue-collar workers, nominated someone for president whose main claim to fame was working for Bain Capital to destroy a bunch of well-established American firms and offshore a huge number of jobs.

        Oh, wait. I guess that kind of hypocrisy DOES still exist. Well, dang.

           0 likes

        • John Troutman
          Posted October 9, 2012 at 3:28 PM | Permalink

          Haha, in defense of Johnson specifically though, he DID practice what he preached. He actually appointed his black manservant as his HEIR!

             1 likes

  4. Posted October 9, 2012 at 12:32 AM | Permalink

    I don’t think “a century ahead” is accurate, since there weren’t many slaves in England proper when slavery was abolished there – they didn’t get rid of slavery in the rest of the empire, where it was bound up with major economic interests, until 1833. Far ahead of the US either way, though.

       0 likes

  5. Pix
    Posted October 9, 2012 at 12:12 AM | Permalink

    ….
    I feel ridiculous because now I’m going to have to go look up that medical procedure to figure out what it is.

       0 likes

    • Pix
      Posted October 9, 2012 at 12:15 AM | Permalink

      O_O Ow….

         1 likes

      • Kaj
        Posted October 9, 2012 at 3:16 AM | Permalink

        The things that must’ve happened in that 3 minute gap…

           3 likes

        • Applemask
          Posted October 10, 2012 at 6:15 PM | Permalink

          A man’s life was changed forever.

             0 likes

          • Pix
            Posted October 13, 2012 at 6:09 PM | Permalink

            *woman’s

               0 likes

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>